Congratulations to all participants submitting papers for issue
# EE 05. We have received 41 contributions of which 2 were very
good, 15 good, 8 average and rest were below average.
"Issue # EE 05
Monitoring and controlling the stack gas temperature of a combustion
process as well as oxygen (O2) in the stack gas are the minimum
requirement to check on unnecessary fuel consumption. Rules of
thumb are that reduction of 20oC of stack gas temperature will
reduce fuel consumption by 1%. Reduction of 1% of O2 in
the stack gas will reduce fuel consumption by between 0.5% and
1% depending
of the fuel fired."
Questions are:
a. Where would you measure the stack gas temperature and why do
you recommend this location, in the system.
b. Which is the best solution to measure either O2 or CO2 in the
stack gas and why is it the best solution.
c. Where would you place the O2 sensor and why do you select this
location.
Most contributors in more or less lengthy and
exhaustive papers with lots of additional information came to
the following right conclusions.
1) Measure the stack gas temperature at a point behind the
last heat exchanger of a boiler.
2) It is best to measure %O2 in the stack gas,
because one can easily see error in calculating the excess air
without knowing the fuel composition.
3) The oxygen sensor should be if possible placed at a point of
positive pressure in the ducting system to
avoid picking up O2 from air
infiltration.
4) None of the papers correctly addressed the issue of measuring
acceptable % O2 in the wet gas, or % O2
in the dry gas, which may give vastly
different results in case of fuels that are moist and / or have
a high
Hydrogen content.
5)There was also no good reference to the issue of measuring acceptable
% O2 at the sensor point while at
the same time there may be already a dangerously
low % O2 level close to the water wall, resulting
in increased repair and maintenance
costs.
We award two first prizes of Rs. 5,000 each to:
1. Mr. K. Gunasekar (Nirma Limited Baroda), and
2. Mr. B. N. Singh (BSES Limited, Dahanu Thermal Power Station)
There are two other good papers submitted, worth mentioning,
though no prize is given to them.
1. Mr. Rajkumar Nagarajan (Central Power Research Institute, Trivandram)
2. Mr. Rashid Shaikh
Congratulations to winners! , Keep up the good
work
For more details see the announcements on www.energymanagertraining.com
Administrator
www.energymanagertraining.com