Login
User ID :

Password :

  

   
  Sections
Announcements
Presentations
Dr. Kaupp's corner
EISEEI Project
Industry process
Case study
Useful tools
Winners papers
Exam updates
Course material
What's new
Industry user group
Downloads
Site tour
Report an error
Contact us
 
 
NECA 2007
S & L
Barriers (29)



29. Lack of Communication to down stream manpower ( Operator Level ) for EC Measures
28. Absence of alternative implementation strategies
27. Post audit reviews in energy audit services
26. Lack of analytical / simulation or software tools for the analysis
25. Comprehensiveness of the report (effective organization of the report)
24. Techno-economic evaluation of measures
23. New technology application
22. Lack of minimum instrumentation, metering and monitoring
21. Cost of energy is too small when compared to production cost
20. Presentation too theoretical-not able to convince the plant personnel during the presentation
19. Non involvement or poor co-ordination among the inter-departments
18. Failure of suggestions due to lack of expertise while implementation
17. Failure or Poor performance of the energy saving retrofits or equipment supplied by the vendors due inferior quality or improper application
16. Poor acceptance of findings of energy audit particularly in relation to operation ,house keeping practices
15. Poor Payment terms for energy audit services and no standardization of payment terms
14. Lack of Management support for implementation of audit findings
13. Use of thumb rules, short cuts, assumptions and approximation in analysis and report preparation
12. Large investments are not attractive options in energy efficiency
11. Lack of expertise and resources during audit field study
10. Plant sees only the first cost rather than life cycle cost while making the fresh purchase
09. Energy inefficiency incorporation in the equipment by design itself
08. Lack of thorough knowledge in energy conservation-Synthetic flat belts Vs V belts
07. Co-operation during the field study of the audit
06. Poor Negotiation with regard to the payment terms
05. Scope of work in the detailed energy audit
04. Disagreement about fact acceptance. (Compressed air consumption in the plant)
03. Assessing the quality of services to fix the professional fees accordingly
02. Plant personnel find energy conservation studies as faultfinding missions- Disagreement about saving potential
01.
 Overlapping of energy conservation measures-energy conservation potential more than energy consumption


  Back
 

 

  

Recommend to a friend :: Related website :: About us :: FAQ :: Sitemap :: Contact us

Energy Manager Training. Copyright © 2004 All Rights Reserved :: Disclaimer